Which of the following is a false statement regarding a condition precedent?
A)When an entire contract is conditioned on something occurring first,that first thing is known as a condition precedent.
B)The parol evidence rule does not apply to evidence of a condition precedent.
C)Evidence of the existence of a condition precedent agreed to orally is inadmissible.
D)A contract is not modified by evidence of the existence of a condition precedent.
E)A contract's enforceability is called into question by evidence of the existence of a condition precedent.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Evidence of the existence of a condition precedent agreed to orally is admissible,because the contract is not modified by such evidence; rather,its enforceability is called into question.Because the statute of frauds is concerned primarily with the enforceability of agreements,it logically follows that the parol evidence rule does not apply to evidence of conditions precedent.

Which of the Following Is a False Statement Regarding a Condition