Which of the following was the result on appeal in the Shelby's,Inc.v.Sierra Bravo,Inc.case referenced in the textbook involving the issue of whether an agreement to deposit debris and soil on land comes within the statute of frauds?
A)The court ruled that the agreement did not involve an interest in land and did not come within the statute of frauds.
B)The court ruled that the agreement did involve an interest in land,that it therefore came within the statute of frauds,and that an oral agreement was not sufficient.
C)The court ruled that the agreement did not involve an interest in land but,nevertheless,applied the statute of frauds in order to prevent injustice.
D)The court ruled that the agreement was within the statute of frauds but that an oral agreement was sufficient.
E)The court ruled that based on longstanding judicial precedent within the state of Missouri,including a recent decision by the Missouri Supreme Court,the statute of frauds does not apply to contracts for the sale of land.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Shelby's,Inc.v.Sierra Bravo,Inc.,the Court of Appeals of Missouri declined to create a new category to which the statute of frauds applies,that of a contract for services for the deposit of dirt and soil on land.

Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in the Shelby's,Inc.v.Sierra