What was the final result on appeal in the Case Opener involving whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied to the lawsuit brought against landowners after the plaintiff fell through a wooden dock located on the defendants' property?
A) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied.
B) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because there was insufficient proof that the type of accident at issue would not normally happen in the absence of negligence.
C) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because there was insufficient proof that the dock at issue was in the exclusive control of the defendants.
D) That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur did not apply because it only applies in contractual cases.
E) That whether or not the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur applied should be decided by the jury.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: Which of the following is liability without
Q49: Which of the following was the result
Q50: Which is the most difficult part of
Q51: Which of the following are laws holding
Q53: Under which of the following does the
Q54: Which of the following occurs when a
Q55: Why have most states replaced the contributory
Q56: Which of the following occurs when a
Q68: Which of the following is an unforeseeable
Q78: Which of the following is a condition
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents