Which of the following is true regarding Charles' claim that he had no obligation to defame Tessa?
A) Charles is correct in that he could not be legally obligated to commit defamation.
B) Charles is correct only if it can be proven that the defamation would cause Tessa money damages.
C) Charles is correct only if it can be proven that the defamation would cause Tessa actual injury.
D) Charles is correct only if it can be proven that the defamation is undeserved.
E) Charles is correct only if it can be proven that he had a prior relationship with Tessa.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Any agreement to commit a crime or tort is illegal and unenforceable.

Which of the Following Is True Regarding Charles' Claim That