Which of the following was the result on appeal in the Case Opener involving the claim that Michael Jordan owed $5 million based on his agreement to pay the plaintiff's mother on the premise that he was the father although it was later determined that the child was not his?
A) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on a mutual mistake of fact.
B) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on the mother's fraud.
C) That the agreement to pay $5 million could be rescinded based on either a mutual mistake of fact or based on the mother's fraud.
D) That the agreement to pay $5 million could not be rescinded because Jordan was aware of a question about his parentage.
E) That the agreement to pay $5 million could not be rescinded because Jordan waited too long in which to complain about the contract.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision that the contract could be rescinded based on either fraud or mutual mistake.

Which of the Following Was the Result on Appeal in the Case