Fama and French (1992) found that
A) firm size had better explanatory power than beta in describing portfolio returns.
B) beta had better explanatory power than firm size in describing portfolio returns.
C) beta had better explanatory power than book-to-market ratios in describing portfolio returns.
D) macroeconomic factors had better explanatory power than beta in describing portfolio returns.
E) None of the options
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: In the 1972 empirical study by Black,
Q15: In the empirical study of a multifactor
Q16: Fama and MacBeth (1973) found that the
Q19: The research by Fama and French suggesting
Q20: Given the results of the early studies
Q21: Consider the regression equation: ri rf =
Q22: Strongest evidence in support of the CAPM
Q23: According to Roll, the only testable hypothesis
Q26: Equity premium puzzle studies may be subject
Q31: Fama and French (2002) studied the equity
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents