Arguments used by Social Darwinists in the United States to justify expansionism
A) were created and first promoted by Charles Darwin himself.
B) differed sharply from arguments used for domestic economic affairs.
C) contended that all nations were engaged in a constant struggle to survive.
D) included the belief that weak nations should be left room to develop.
E) suggested that harmony among "races" depended on open markets and free trade.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Social Darwinists believed that all nations were engaged in a constant struggle to survive, and this struggle was viewed as a natural and necessary process of evolution. Expansionism was seen as a means of securing resources and markets, and of spreading civilization and progress. This argument was used to justify the acquisition of territories such as Hawaii, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines.

Answer: E
 Social Darwinists believed that the harmony among "races" depended on open markets and free trade. They argued that competition was necessary for progress and that protectionism only weakened economies. Therefore, expanding markets and creating free trade zones through empire building was seen as a way to promote peace and stability among nations. This argument was used to justify the acquisition of territories such as Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and other parts of Latin America.

Arguments Used by Social Darwinists in the United States to Justify