In the case in the text,Rasmussen v.Jackson,the court held that:
A)although Jackson and Rasmussen had joint property,this was not enough to create a partnership.
B)although Jackson and Rasmussen shared gross returns,this was not enough to create a partnership.
C)there was no evidence of a partnership.
D)although Jackson and Rasmussen shared profits,this was not enough to create a partnership.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court held that there was no evidence of a partnership.The parties did not have joint property,did not share in gross returns,and did not share profits.

In the Case in the Text,Rasmussen V