In the case in the text,In re Sia,the court held that:
A)the inclusion of the notice provision was burdensome and destroyed the negotiability of the note.
B)the challenged clauses were not additional undertakings,and the note was negotiable.
C)the inclusion of the conditional payment clause did not constitute a "fixed amount of money" and rendered the document nonnegotiable.
D)the challenged clauses were additional undertakings,and the clauses destroyed the negotiability of the note.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In this case,the court rejected the contention that several clauses in a promissory note and accompanying mortgage were additional undertakings that vitiated the negotiability of the note.

In the Case in the Text,In Re Sia,the Court Held