In the case in the text,State of Connecticut v.Cardwell,the court held that the defendant did not sell tickets in Connecticut because:
A)the sale of goods was over the internet,and the purchase location is where the seller lives.
B)the contracts were classified as shipment contracts and they were completed in Massachusetts.
C)the defendant did not have substantial contacts with Connecticut.
D)the defendant's only connection with the state was that it had an office there,even though that office did not sell tickets to Connecticut residents.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court concluded that the contracts were shipment contracts.Because delivery of the goods to the carrier constitutes delivery to the buyer under a shipment contract,section 2-401(2) (a),with respect to each sale of tickets made by the defendant,delivery is made to the post office or other commercial carrier,and hence to the buyer,within Massachusetts.

In the Case in the Text,State of Connecticut V