A written agreement was signed by two parties and it was intended to be their entire agreement.The parol evidence rule will prevent the admission of evidence that is offered to:
A) prove the existence of additional terms of the agreement to contradict the written terms of the contract.
B) prove the existence of a subsequent oral agreement that modifies the contract.
C) explain the meaning of an ambiguity in the written contract.
D) establish that fraud had been committed in the formation of the contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q75: Which of the following statements about the
Q76: In the case in the text,Browning v.Poirier,the
Q77: When a person undertakes an obligation that
Q78: In determining whether a contract is within
Q79: Which of the following is a contract
Q81: Which of the following statements about "usage"
Q82: Once a court has decided what promises
Q83: Arnold promised to sell his car to
Q84: _ is an equitable doctrine that protects
Q85: In the case in the text,Yung-Kai Lu
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents