Greg sues Ned in an effort to obtain title to some land claimed by Ned and located inside the state of Texas.Ned has never been to Texas in his life,has never had any contacts of any kind with the state,and refuses to appear in Texas to defend against Greg's suit.Later,after Greg wins a default judgment against Ned,Ned shows up in Texas to claim that the judgment was invalid because he was totally outside Texas,hence Texas courts had no jurisdiction over him,and for this reason they could not affect his rights to the land.Is Ned right? Why or why not? Assume that subject-matter jurisdiction exists.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q80: John lives and works in State A.While
Q81: What are the consequences of document alteration
Q82: In the text case AT&T Mobility LLC
Q83: Which of the following would be subject
Q84: What was the Court's holding in the
Q85: Dee sues Gerry for defamation.Dee thinks that
Q86: What two kinds of jurisdiction are necessary
Q88: Does the Federal Arbitration Act override a
Q89: A _ is when the jury makes
Q90: _ refers to the pretrial jury screening
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents