According to Braut v. Stec, what is the Courts' position when one enters into a contract where a claim is made that a bargain is unconscionable?
A) There is an automatic presumption of undue influence due to the relationship of the parties.
B) A close relationship between business associates prevents a finding of unconscionability.
C) When one party lacks the intellect to enter into a contract, the contract continues to be binding on both parties.
D) A presumption of fraud is raised when there is an inequality in the position of the parties due to the ignorance of the weaker party.
E) Because a party to the contract is an uneducated immigrant, the contract is voidable.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

According to Braut v. Stec, when there is an inequality in the position of the parties due to the ignorance of the weaker party, a presumption of fraud is raised. This means that the court is more likely to find the bargain unconscionable and may declare the contract void or unenforceable.

According to Braut V