In Moss v.Chin,Chin's insurer,ICBC,made an offer to settle a claim that was accepted by the public trustee representing Mrs.Moss.ICBC was not aware that Mrs.Moss had died in the interim.ICBC made a unilateral mistake and yet the Court ordered that the contract be rescinded.What was the rationale?
A) ICBC lacked capacity to make an offer, as only Chin had such a right.
B) The public trustee lacked capacity to accept an offer, as only Mrs. Moss could do, and she had died.
C) It is illegal to settle a claim when the claimant is not longer alive.
D) There was no consideration to support the claim, and therefore the contract was invalid.
E) ICBC had not misled itself, rather the public trustee had deliberately set out to keep ICBC from discovering the truth.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Damages are available as a remedy where
Q44: In AMJ Campbell v. Kord Products Inc.,
Q45: In 978011 Ontario Ltd. v. Cornell Engineering
Q51: Al sells gravel to Bob on credit,
Q56: Lars Jepsen, a fisherman from Tofino, regularly
Q59: In Sylvan Lake Golf & Tennis Club
Q74: Selling the contents of the house in
Q76: A and B entered into a contract
Q90: Fraudulent misrepresentation is intentionally misleading another person
Q91: The victim of intentional misrepresentation can sue
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents