Mr.Holden,a program developer,had a successful business helping small firms and shops computerize their businesses.In his spare time,he developed software for inventory control that was superior to others on the market.He launched an ad campaign and all went well for several months-until a competitor came out with a cheaper program.In time,he could not pay his debts when they became due and owing.A supplier sued for damages and was awarded $21 000.Holden did not pay.With regard to the supplier's position at this time,which of the following is false?
A) Since the decision is in his favour, the supplier would be a judgment creditor, Holden, a judgment debtor.
B) The supplier could have a garnishee order served on Holden's bank, ordering the bank to pay money into court instead of to Holden.
C) The supplier could examine Holden under oath about his assets and sources of income.
D) The supplier could obtain a writ of execution that directs a court official to seize Holden and detain him in court until he arranges payment.
E) The supplier could get a government official to seize and sell enough of Holden's property to satisfy the debt.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Which of the following involves a question
Q28: In the procedure leading to trial of
Q29: Which of the following accurately reflects a
Q32: In the Ontario Court of Appeal decision
Q34: Several provinces have implemented "mental health courts."
Q35: The procedure that allows a judgment creditor
Q36: Which of the following is incorrect with
Q36: With regard to the process of a
Q37: Hank sold three properties for Mr.W and
Q39: Which of the following is correct with
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents