Which of the following cases held that the area within the immediate control of the arrestee may properly be searched, but there is no justification for police to search rooms other than the one in which the arrest occurred?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Chimel v. California held that the area within the immediate control of the arrestee may be searched, but there is no justification for police to search rooms other than the one in which the arrest occurred. This ruling established the "Chimel rule" which limits the scope of searches incident to arrest.

Which of the Following Cases Held That the Area Within