What type of contract is a possible remedy for an injured plaintiff in a case with no valid contract,when the plaintiff can show benefit to the defendant,reasonable expectation of payment,and unjust enrichment?
A)an express contract
B)an implied contract
C)a quasi-contract
D)a unilateral contract

Question

What type of contract is a possible remedy for an injured plaintiff in a case with no valid contract,when the plaintiff can show benefit to the defendant,reasonable expectation of payment,and unjust enrichment? 
A)an express contract
B)an implied contract
C)a quasi-contract
D)a unilateral contract

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A quasi-contract, also known as an implied-in-law contract, is a legal construct used to create an obligation between parties in the absence of a valid contract. In this case, the plaintiff would be able to show that the defendant received a benefit, had a reasonable expectation of payment, and would be unjustly enriched if they were not required to pay for the benefit received. Therefore, a quasi-contract would provide a possible remedy for the injured plaintiff in this situation. An express contract requires an actual agreement between the parties, a unilateral contract requires acceptance through performance, and neither of these contracts would be applicable in this scenario.

What Type of Contract Is a Possible Remedy for an Injured