Kent Corp.(KC),a general contractor building a new dorm at a university,contracted with Fine Rugs Inc.(FRI)to have a certain grade of industrial rugs installed in the dorm.The contract price was $180,000.After the rugs were installed,KC was dissatisfied with the rug quality.FRI insisted that the rugs installed were appropriate to the contract specifications and demanded full payment.KC sends FRI a check for $120,000,which KC believes is the proper value for the rugs installed,and marks the check "Paid in Full." FRI writes "Under Protest" on the check and deposits it.FRI may now,in most states,successfully sue KC for the balance of $60,000.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Anticipatory repudiation may be used when a
Q24: Burt and Mel have entered into a
Q25: Incidental beneficiaries are identified during the formation
Q26: Impossibility of performance is subjective,meaning that one
Q27: Generally,courts do enforce a strict compliance standard
Q29: Substantial performance will be enforced only if
Q30: Specific performance is almost always available when
Q31: Mel is under contract with a textbook
Q32: In an assignment or delegation,third-party rights or
Q33: A rescission of a contract may occur
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents