Joe was a contractor and he hired subtrades to help build his houses.Sam was a framer and had agreed to frame four houses for Joe for a set price.Joe was to supply the materials.After two houses were completed,Joe's suppliers increased the cost of lumber,and Joe told Sam that he could no longer pay him the amount on which they'd agreed.Sam agreed to take 15% less for the other two jobs,which were then completed.During this time,regular payments were made from Joe to Sam,but the total amount received was 15% lower than the originally agreed-upon price for the last two jobs.Sam sued Joe for the original contract price,claiming that he'd received no consideration for his agreement to take less for the last two jobs.Explain what defences may be available to Joe under these circumstances and his likelihood of success.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q111: Assume that all other requirements for a
Q113: Distinguish between a void contract and a
Q115: Which one of the following correctly indicates
Q117: Ted,a 17-year-old high school student,was hired to
Q118: Explain the legal position of an infant
Q118: Neither party is bound by a contract
Q119: Indicate what types of contracts are binding
Q119: Which of the following would be resolved
Q121: Which of the following contracts is void?
A)a
Q181: Explain the principle of promissory estoppel and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents