Adrian is pursuing a constructive dismissal dispute with his former employers,Chiles Properties.They both agree to opt for a final-offer arbitration process to resolve their dispute.Which of the following best ensures that Adrian's interests are well served?
A) Adrian should come up with a final settlement proposal that the arbitrator will consider to be fairer than that of Chiles Properties.
B) Adrian should drive a hard bargain and insist on the best possible settlement terms in his final proposal to the arbitrator.
C) Adrian should adopt settlement terms that are slightly more favorable to Chiles Properties than himself.
D) Adrian should compose his settlement proposal such that it shows his former employers in an unfavorable light.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In a final-offer arbitration process, each party presents a final settlement proposal, and the arbitrator chooses the proposal that is deemed to be the most fair and reasonable. Therefore, Adrian should focus on coming up with a final settlement proposal that is fairer than that of his former employers, rather than trying to drive a hard bargain or make the settlement terms more favorable to Chiles Properties. It is not ethical or effective to compose a settlement proposal that shows his former employers in an unfavorable light. Ultimately, the goal should be to present a proposal that is reasonable and fair to both parties, while also serving Adrian's interests.

Adrian Is Pursuing a Constructive Dismissal Dispute with His Former