Which of the following would be the strongest evidence for or against the necklace's effectiveness?
A) A bar graph comparing the percentage of players who do with the percentage of players who do not wear the necklace
B) A scatter plot showing days on the disabled list and percentage of players who do or do not wear the necklace
C) A bar graph illustrating the satisfaction levels of the players who wear the necklace
D) A bar graph comparing batting averages of the players who wear the official titanium necklace and those who were unknowingly wearing a fake titanium necklace

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The most relevant evidence for the necklace's effectiveness would be related to its impact on the players' performance. Option D provides a direct comparison of the batting averages between players who wear the official titanium necklace and those who wear a fake one. This would show whether the necklace has a significant impact on their batting ability, which is a crucial factor in their performance. Options A and C may provide some insights into the players' experience with the necklace, but they don't offer empirical evidence of its effectiveness. Option B may show a correlation between injuries and necklace use, but it doesn't directly address its impact on performance.

Which of the Following Would Be the Strongest Evidence for or Against