Learning is slower with continuous reinforcement than with partial reinforcement.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Research suggests that learning may actually be stronger and more persistent with continuous reinforcement compared to partial reinforcement. With continuous reinforcement, the desired behavior is consistently followed by a reward, making it easier for the learner to associate the behavior with the outcome. With partial reinforcement, the behavior is sometimes rewarded and sometimes not, leading to more confusion for the learner and potentially slower learning.

Learning Is Slower with Continuous Reinforcement Than with Partial Reinforcement