In the case of Pittsley v.Houser, the court:
A)held that the contract should be severed into different parts, applying the UCC to the part of the contract involving goods and the common law to the nongoods part of the contract.
B)held that the "predominant factor" test contravened the UCC's declared purpose.
C)applied the "predominant factor" test.
D)found the CISG governed the contract in question.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court applied the "predominant factor" test to determine whether the contract was primarily for the sale of goods (governed by the UCC) or for the provision of services (governed by common law).

In the Case of Pittsley V.Houser, the Court