A state court can exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant,but the defendant must have
A)minimum contacts with the state.
B)maximum contacts with the state.
C)legitimate contacts with the state.
D)legal contacts with the state.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In order for a state court to exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant, the defendant must have minimum contacts with the state. This means that the defendant had certain interactions or connections with the state, such as doing business or committing a tort, that are enough to justify the court's exercise of jurisdiction over them. Maximum or legitimate contacts are not necessary criteria for jurisdiction, and "legal contacts" is not a term used in this context.

A State Court Can Exercise Jurisdiction Over an Out-Of-State Defendant,but