Two researchers want to determine the opinion of the average U.S.citizen regarding gun control.One conducts his survey at a national fishing and hunting convention,while the other
Researcher surveys participants at a animal rights convention.Regarding the accuracy of
These survey results in determining the viewpoint of the average U.S.citizen,
A) the survey conducted at the animal rights convention would be more accurate.
B) the survey conducted at the national fishing and hunting convention would be more accurate.
C) the combination of the two surveys would produce a balanced and accurate set of
Results.
D) both samples would be considered biased.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Both samples would be considered biased. The sample taken at the national fishing and hunting convention would likely be biased towards individuals who are pro-gun and therefore, against gun control. Whereas the sample taken at the animal rights convention would likely be biased towards individuals who are anti-gun and therefore, in favor of gun control. Therefore, neither sample would be representative of the broader population of the average U.S. citizen's opinion on the issue of gun control.

Two Researchers Want to Determine the Opinion of the Average