In which of the following cases was the plaintiff successful on the basis of promissory estoppel?
A) East Van Villages v Minister Administrating the National Parks and Wildlife [2001] NSWSC 559.
B) Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101.
C) Austotel Pty Ltd v Franklins Selfservice Pty Ltd (1989) 16 NSWLR 582.
D) None of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Consideration must be present or future,it cannot
Q26: Executed consideration is also referred to as
Q27: Estoppel is based on an assumption of
Q28: Only a promise supported by consideration will
Q29: A moral consideration cannot amount to good
Q31: Estoppel was rejected Easts Van Villages v
Q32: The plaintiff in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co
Q33: Why is consideration important in respect to
Q34: Explain what is meant by the expression
Q35: Which of the following is NOT an
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents