Why was a letter of comfort held to be contractually binding in the case of Banque Brussels Lambert SA v Australian National Industries Ltd (1989) 21 NSWLR 502?
A) The letter was vaguely written.
B) The wording of the letter lacked a guarantee.
C) The wording of the letter did not establish intent.
D) The wording of the letter was promissory and intended to create a legally binding obligation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: In which of the following cases did
Q16: Which of the following is NOT one
Q17: The decision in Jones v Vernon Pools
Q18: In the case of Carlill v Carbolic
Q19: Explain the two legal presumptions that assist
Q21: In Darmanin v Cowan [2010] NSWSC 1118
Q22: It is assumed that a contract of
Q23: Whilst the common law may not consider
Q24: What is the courts' rationale for presuming
Q25: The law presumes that in social agreements
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents