In Deatons v Flew (1949) 79 CLR 370,why was the hotelier NOT liable to the injured customer?
A) Because the barmaid lost her temper.
B) Because the injured customer had provoked the barmaid and was contributorily negligent.
C) Because the barmaid's actions were outside the scope of her employment.
D) Because the barmaid was not an employee.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: Under the civil liability acts,the definition of
Q13: An employer will be vicariously liable for
Q14: Following the decision in Esanda Finance Corporation
Q15: Pure economic loss means there is no
Q16: The decision in Burnie Port Authority v
Q18: An action for harm caused by a
Q19: A driver of a vehicle registered in
Q20: In certain circumstances,the wrongful acts of one
Q21: Liability for criminal negligence might arise because:
A)the
Q22: For an occupier,where the risk is obvious,the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents