What was the reason for the decision in the case of Van Den Esschert v Chappell [1960] WAR 114?
A)The seller's oral statement was regarded as collateral.
B)The seller's oral statement was inconsistent with the terms of the written agreement.
C)The seller's oral statement was truthful.
D)The seller's oral statement was ambiguous.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The reason for the decision in the case of Van Den Esschert v Chappell [1960] WAR 114 was that the seller's oral statement was regarded as collateral. The court held that the seller's oral statement was not part of the contract and could not be relied upon by the buyer. The written agreement was clear and unambiguous, and the court stated that the seller's oral statements could not be used to contradict or vary the terms of the written agreement. Therefore, the seller could not be held liable for any defects that were not specifically mentioned in the written agreement.

What Was the Reason for the Decision in the Case