Why are approach-approach conflicts likely to create more cognitive dissonance than approach-avoidance conflicts?
A) Approach-avoidance conflicts result when the positive alternative simply overwhelms the negative, thus no cognitive dissonance exists under this condition.
B) Approach-approach conflicts result when both alternatives are positive. The selection of one requires the rejection of another, which creates a need for a cognitive explanation of why one positive choice was not selected.
C) Approach-avoidance conflicts create inertia, thus past habits are employed without the need to resolve the cognitive inconsistencies.
D) Approach-approach conflicts are very confusing to resolve intellectually, but approach-avoidance conflicts are typically simply resolved through behavioral aspects of reinforcement learning.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Approach-approach conflicts create cognitive dissonance because both alternatives are positive and the selection of one requires the rejection of another, which creates the need for a cognitive explanation of why one positive choice was not selected. In contrast, approach-avoidance conflicts may result in inertia and the use of past habits to avoid cognitive inconsistencies. Additionally, approach-avoidance conflicts can be resolved through reinforcement learning, which focuses more on behavioral aspects.

Why Are Approach-Approach Conflicts Likely to Create More Cognitive Dissonance