General Theory
-Statistics indicate a rough inverse correlation between income and rate of crime: the lower the income, the higher the rate of crime. Using one of Mill's Methods, we might conclude that low income is the cause of crime. But could we somehow use Mill's Methods (plus more investigation) to prove that other factors "really" are the cause of crime? How might this happen?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Mill's Methods, specifically the method of difference, can be used to help establish causation between low income and crime. This method involves comparing situations where the effect is present with situations where the effect is absent, and identifying the difference between the two.

In the case of low income and crime, we could use this method to compare areas with similar income levels but differing crime rates. If we find that there are areas with low income but low crime rates, or areas with high income but high crime rates, it would indicate that there are other factors at play besides income.

Further investigation could then be conducted to identify these other factors. This might involve looking at social and economic factors such as education levels, employment opportunities, access to resources, and community support systems. It could also involve considering psychological and behavioral factors such as individual resilience, coping mechanisms, and social support networks.

By using Mill's Methods as a starting point and then conducting more in-depth investigation, we can potentially uncover the complex web of factors that contribute to crime, and ultimately establish a more nuanced understanding of the causes of crime beyond just low income.

General Theory -Statistics Indicate a Rough Inverse Correlation Between Income and Rate