In the case Rosenberg v.Son,Inc.,the Court held that:
A)Son, Inc., as the assignee, was liable to the Rosenbergs.
B)Despite the assignment of her rights, Pratt remained liable to the Rosenbergs.
C)The assignment became a novation because Rosenberg signed it.
D)The Rosenbergs became liable to Son, Inc.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Rosenberg v. Son, Inc., the court held that despite the assignment of her rights, Pratt remained liable to the Rosenbergs, indicating that an assignment does not relieve the assignor of their original obligations unless a novation occurs.

In the Case Rosenberg V.Son,Inc.,the Court Held That