Each of the following situations involves a possible violation of the independence requirements of the provincial institutes Rules of Professional Conduct. For each situation, (1) decide whether the Rules have been violated, and (2) briefly explain how the situation violates (or does not violate) the Rules.
A) Mike Lednicky, public accountant, is a partner in the Oshawa office of Arthur & Thompson, public accountants. Mike's brother is employed as an inventory warehouse supervisor (an audit-sensitive position) by Sweeny Appliances, a publicly-held company in Manitoba. Sweeny Appliances is one of Arthur & Thompson's audit clients. Neither Mike nor the Oshawa office of Arthur & Thompson is involved in the audit of Sweeny Appliances.
Violation? Yes No

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Each of the following situations involves a possible violation of the independence requirements of the provincial institutes Rules of Professional Conduct. For each situation, (1) decide whether the Rules have been violated, and (2) briefly explain how the situation violates (or does not violate) the Rules.
A) Mike Lednicky, public accountant, is a partner in the Oshawa office of Arthur & Thompson, public accountants. Mike's brother is employed as an inventory warehouse supervisor (an audit-sensitive position) by Sweeny Appliances, a publicly-held company in Manitoba. Sweeny Appliances is one of Arthur & Thompson's audit clients. Neither Mike nor the Oshawa office of Arthur & Thompson is involved in the audit of Sweeny Appliances.
Violation? Yes No

Each of the Following Situations Involves a Possible Violation of the Independence