The absence of a sufficiently close relationship between Roger's action and Jamel's injury is based on which of the following?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The concept of remoteness of damage in tort law relates to whether the harm suffered by the claimant was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant's actions. If the damage suffered by the claimant is too remote, the defendant will not be held liable. In this case, it appears that there was not a sufficiently close relationship between Roger's action and Jamel's injury to hold Roger liable, indicating that the harm suffered was too remote.

The Absence of a Sufficiently Close Relationship Between Roger's Action