What is the proper method of leading contrary evidence to challenge a legal presumption favouring one party?
A) a rebuttable presumption of the parties' intent to contract
B) the doctrine of rebuttable inference of refusal to contract
C) the doctrine of rebuttable assumption of pre-existing condition
D) a rebuttable promise for which no consideration is given

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

A rebuttable presumption of the parties' intent to contract allows for the introduction of contrary evidence to challenge the legal presumption that favours one party, by proving that the parties did not intend to enter into a contract.

What Is the Proper Method of Leading Contrary Evidence to Challenge