Shapiro v. Thompson held that residency requirements for welfare benefits interfered with
A) equal protection
B)the right to travel
C) both (A) and (B)
D) neither (A) nor (B)

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Shapiro v. Thompson ruled that residency requirements for welfare benefits violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and interfered with the right to travel by penalizing those who wish to migrate to a different state by denying them welfare benefits.

Shapiro V Thompson Held That Residency Requirements for Welfare Benefits Interfered