Merilaita and Lind (2005) used artificial prey and an artificial background, but real avian predators, to test the hypothesis that background matching is maximized when coloration visually matches a random sample of the background. They used two types of prey patterns as experimental stimuli, one type judged difficult to detect and another type judged easy to detect. Prior to the actual experiment, "ease of detection" for the two prey types was judged by
A) a computer program.
B) birds.
C) both humans and birds.
D) humans.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A predatory bird that eats a monarch
Q2: Most forms of animal camouflage, e.g., matching
Q3: John Endler's (1978) definition of an animal's
Q5: Research evidence suggests that background matching is
Q6: Feltmate and Williams (1989) allowed stone nymphs
Q7: Animals that employ background matching are camouflaged
Q8: The cephalopod mollusks known as cuttlefish
A) are
Q9: Sometimes background matching is not sufficient to
Q10: Cuthill and colleagues (2005) conducted a field
Q11: Cuthill and colleagues (2005) conducted a field
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents