Match the case with the correct ruling with regard to a "stop."
-United States v. Mendenhall
A) Ruled that a person has been seized when a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave.
B) Ruled that in order to determine whether a particular encounter constitutes a seizure, a court must consider all the circumstances surrounding the encounter to determine whether the police conduct would have communicated to a reasonable person that the person was not free to decline the officer's requests or otherwise terminate the encounter.
C) The 16-hour detention of a traveler at the border was permissible.
D) Ruled the seizure of a person during a pursuit occurs only when there is an application of force by the police or the suspect submits to police authority.
E) What constitutes a restraint on liberty prompting a person to conclude that he is not free to leave will vary, not only with the particular police conduct at issue, but also with the setting in which the conduct occurs.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q46: Minnesota v. Dickerson is the case that
Q47: A(n) _ is nothing more than a
Q48: Police officers can stop and detain motorists
Q49: The Supreme Court in Reid v. Georgia
Q50: A(n) _ detention is less intrusive than
Q52: Match the case with the correct ruling
Q53: Match the case with the correct ruling
Q54: Match the case with the correct ruling
Q55: Match the case with the correct ruling
Q56: Match the case with the correct expansion
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents