In the following description about impact of Electronic Meeting System (EMS) on group participation and decisions, which one is appropriate?
A) Anonymity makes irrelevant contributions from meeting participants become prevalent in electronic meetings;
B) The ability of participants to work in parallel (on either the same or different subjects) increases a sense of group achievement;
C) Anonymous criticism makes premature convergence to suboptimal resolutions becomes inevitable;
D) EMS divides a group decision process into multiple stages, leaving no chance for the group to stay focused during the process;
E) A system interface that only allows short comments always discourages new ideas being presented.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The ability of participants to work in parallel increases efficiency and can enhance the sense of group achievement, as it allows for more contributions within the same timeframe. This is a recognized benefit of Electronic Meeting Systems (EMS).

In the Following Description About Impact of Electronic Meeting System