Planter is a consultant for Succulent Co. and they issue him a $5,000 check payable to cash as payment. Before leaving for the bus, the Planter, in hast, stuffs the check in his briefcase without indorsement. Later that day, the briefcase is stolen, and the thief then signs his own name and indorses it with "Pay to the Order of Kane's Furniture." The thief delivers the check to the furniture store to satisfy an outstanding debt on a recent purchase. Your common sense may tell you that the thief would not prevail in this case, but what is the legal reasoning? Classify the roles of Planter, Succulent Co., and the thief classified in this transaction? Explain.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q38: The _ promoted a regulation that preserves
Q39: The Holder Rule _ a consumer's rights
Q40: Only transactions between a consumer and a
Q41: FTC regulations make it an "unfair or
Q42: Most courts have held that the Holder
Q43: In Hemmings v. Camping Time RV Centers
Q44: Name and describe the process of negotiating
Q46: Suppose that Ansley gives a check to
Q47: Barton Beers sells 5,000 of a variety
Q48: Phillip purchases a brand-new, expensive oven from
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents