In DCS Sanitary Management v. Castillo, where a company had employees agree not to work for any competitors within 100 miles of any customer of DCS, the appeals court held that the agreement:
A) overly broad and could not be enforced
B) violated public policy and that the company must pay damages to the employees
C) was not enforceable due to lack of consideration
D) was a reasonable restraint on competition that could be enforced
E) was a valid restraint on competition since such agreements are legal unless they violate the antitrust laws

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The appeals court held that the agreement was overly broad and could not be enforced. It placed unreasonable restrictions on the employees' ability to work and secure employment opportunities.

In DCS Sanitary Management V