Jin worked on technical developments for Motorola. One year she took a leave of absence to return to her home country, China, to work for a year. After returning to Motorola, she downloaded thousands of documents, many of which involved trade secrets. She bought a one-way ticket to China and was arrested at the airport when she was about to go to China with the documents. She was convicted of theft and sentenced to four years in prison. The court of appeals held that she was:
A) improperly convicted as there was no evidence that the secrets had commercial value.
B) improperly convicted as she had the right to access such materials as a Motorola employee and had not delivered them to anyone else.
C) improperly convicted because she had no knowledge that the information had national security implications.
D) properly convicted.
E) none of the other choices are correct.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q397: In Bohnsack v. Varco, inventor Bohnsack discussed
Q398: Intellectual property protection around the world is
Q399: Information that is not known by the
Q400: Which of the following can be patented
Q401: Chevaldina had a business dispute with Katz,
Q402: Jin worked on technical developments for Motorola.
Q403: Suppose a company steals a commercial trade
Q404: Under the _ "whoever, with intent to
Q406: Chevaldina had a business dispute with Katz,
Q407: Under the _ "whoever, with intent to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents