In Wal-Mart v. Samara Brothers, where Wal-Mart was accused of copying the design of children's clothing, the Supreme Court held that for trade dress protection to exist, the good or service must:
A) be distinctive
B) be identified as to origin
C) have secondary meaning
D) all of the other specific choices
E) none of the other choices

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court held that for trade dress protection to exist, the good or service must be distinctive, identified as to origin, and have secondary meaning. Therefore, the correct choice is D, which includes all of the specific choices.

In Wal-Mart V