"All logic professors are funny individuals.No businessman is a funny individual. Therefore, all businessmen are non-logic professors."
Is this argument ready for testing, or does it need to be rewritten?
A)No.It is clearly valid as it is.
B)The conclusion should be changed to its logically equivalent form "No busi- nessman is a logic professor."
C)The conclusion should be changed to its logically equivalent form "No non- logic professor is a businessman."
D)This syllogism is clearly invalid.No further testing is necessary.

Question

"All logic professors are funny individuals.No businessman is a funny individual. Therefore, all businessmen are non-logic professors."
 Is this argument ready for testing, or does it need to be rewritten?
A)No.It is clearly valid as it is.
B)The conclusion should be changed to its logically equivalent form "No busi- nessman is a logic professor."
C)The conclusion should be changed to its logically equivalent form "No non- logic professor is a businessman."
D)This syllogism is clearly invalid.No further testing is necessary.

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is B

"All Logic Professors Are Funny Individuals