W. K. Clifford argued that it is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone to believe anything on insufficient evidence. His critics have claimed that this argument fails owing to
A) overgeneralization.
B) not properly using the principle of sufficient reason.
C) begging the question.
D) post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Clifford's argument can be seen as an overgeneralization, in that it applies a strict standard of evidence that may not always be necessary or practical in every situation. It also assumes that there is a universal moral imperative to always seek out and adhere to the highest possible standard of evidence, which some may disagree with. Alternatively, one could argue for a more nuanced approach that takes into account factors such as personal experience and cultural context.

W K Clifford Argued That It Is Wrong Always, Everywhere, and and for Anyone