Why isn't the fact that the number of people enrolled in welfare programs decreased substantially after 1996 welfare reform an indisputable sign of the reform's success?
A) There were not enough jobs for people to move into.
B) Poverty levels have not changed even though people are no longer receiving welfare benefits.
C) There are disputes over how the data were measured.
D) There was still widespread corruption in the programs.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

While the number of people enrolled in welfare programs decreased substantially after 1996 welfare reform, poverty levels have not changed even though people are no longer receiving welfare benefits. This indicates that the decrease in enrollment may not necessarily be a sign of the reform's success in reducing poverty.

Why Isn't the Fact That the Number of People Enrolled