All of the following were reasons that Totten (2001) had to prioritize protection from harm over confidentiality in his study except
A) State law required that he had to report any child abuse he observed.
B) Mental health providers needed to be made aware of anyone suicidal.
C) He made the boys aware there were instances when he'd have to contact the authorities about what he learned.
D) The boys he studied witnessed their mother's being beaten.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

None of the other reasons listed involve witnessing domestic violence, which is a critical factor in prioritizing protection from harm over confidentiality. State law requiring reporting of child abuse, mental health providers needing to be made aware of suicidal individuals, and informing the boys about instances where authorities would need to be contacted are all related to protecting the participants from harm.

All of the Following Were Reasons That Totten (2001) Had