If Neuroscience Makes Progress, Then the Mind Is the Brain

If neuroscience makes progress, then the mind is the brain. If the mind is soul-like, then rational thought is inexplicable. If neuroscience does not progress, then the mind is soul- like. If philosophy of mind is vacuous, then the mind is not the brain and rational thought is explicable. So, philosophy of mind is not vacuous.
-Which of the following is the best translation into PL of this argument?

A) N ⊃ M S ⊃ R
∼N ⊃ M
V ⊃ (∼M • R) / ∼V
B) N ⊃ M S ⊃ R
N ⊃ M
V ⊃ (∼M • R) / ∼V
C) N ⊃ M S ⊃ ∼R
∼N ⊃ S
V ⊃ (∼M • R) / ∼V
D) N ⊃ M S ⊃ ∼R
∼N ⊃ S
V ⊃ ∼M / ∼V
E) N ⊃ M M ⊃ ∼R
∼N ⊃ M
(V ⊃ ∼M) • R / ∼V