In reply to the children's welfare objection to NRTs, defenders of NRTs argued that since without NRTs some children with disabilities would not exist, NRTs
A) Can never harm the children brought into existence with a disability
B) Can harm children brought into existence with a disability only if their lives are not worth living
C) Can always harm the children brought into existence with a disability
D) None of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Defenders of NRTs argue that the benefits of allowing some children with disabilities to be born outweigh the potential harm of their disability. Therefore, harm can only happen if the child's life is not worth living, which is a subjective evaluation. This argument acknowledges that harm can occur, but it is not a blanket statement that NRTs always harm children with disabilities.

In Reply to the Children's Welfare Objection to NRTs, Defenders