Is Kant correct in asserting that people should be praised or blamed only for what they have control over and not for what they have no control over? It seems obvious that congratulating someone on his height or punishing a mentally handicapped person for not doing algebra correctly is ridiculous. Yet, along with Aristotle, we still do this for virtues and vices, even though a person's courage, wit, wealth, and so forth, is often due to heredity and upbringing rather than personal choice. How do you know when, and in what proportion, to praise or blame?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q54: Think of one or more moral dilemmas
Q55: What are the moral dangers of suggesting,
Q56: How plausible is the idea that men
Q57: Does it make any sense to ask
Q58: Consider the anecdote about Abraham Lincoln. While
Q60: What did Nietzsche mean by "Man is
Q61: Hume argued that morality was ultimately based
Q62: The categorical imperative depends on _.
Q63: Utilitarianism is a refined form of _.
Q64: For Kant, we should always avoid treating
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents